Engineering dismemberment of the contract, issued false test report……Provincial Housing and Construction Department announced the first batch of 10 typical illegal cases this year
Yanzhao evening news media reporters Chen xia reporters yesterday learned from hebei province housing and construction, to give full play to the typical cases of illegal warning education function, strengthen the law-abiding consciousness of market main body, effectively protect the housing urban and rural construction market order, recently, the ministry of housing and urban and rural construction department bulletin in 2022 the first batch of 10 typical law-breaking cases,It covers the illegal acts of disassembling the project, issuing false test report, failing to handle the record of project completion acceptance according to law and so on.Case 1: Dismember contract case of Hengshui Hongmei Real Estate Development Co., LTD. When the company was developing and constructing the first phase of Hengshui 313 Yongjin Peninsula in Hengshui City, it dismember the project and contract the project, which violated the provisions of Article 7 of the Regulations on Quality Management of Construction Projects.The Hengshui City Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau imposed a fine of 124,284.84 yuan and a fine of 6,214.24 yuan on the relevant personnel respectively.Case 2: Handan Hengtai Construction Engineering Testing Co., Ltd. issuing false test Report The company forged test data and issued false test report, which violated the provisions of Article 8 of the “Construction Engineering Quality Testing Management Measures”.Handan Congtai District comprehensive administrative law enforcement Bureau made a fine of 30000 yuan of administrative penalties, to the relevant personnel respectively made a fine of 3000 yuan of administrative penalties.Three cases:Luanping Fengsenzheng Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. failed to handle the project completion acceptance record according to law. The shanshui Haoting residential area project developed and constructed by the company in Luanping County failed to pass the completion acceptance inspection within 15 days.It violates article 49 of the Regulations on Quality Control of Construction projects by submitting the completion acceptance report of construction projects and the approval documents issued by the departments of planning, public security, fire protection and environmental protection or the documents of permitted use to the competent construction administrative departments for the record.The Luanping County Bureau of Housing and Urban-Rural Development imposed an administrative penalty of 200,000 yuan on them and 10,000 yuan on those involved.Case 4: Hebei Province Third Construction Engineering Co., LTD. Not according to the design drawings of the company in Changli County construction of tiancheng Fu South district project, building 7# third floor wall column reinforcement installation not according to the design drawings, its behavior violates the “Construction project quality management Regulations” article 28 provisions.Changli County Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau made a fine of 138,063.72 yuan to the administrative penalty, the relevant personnel made a fine of 9,664.46 yuan respectively.Case 5: Beijing Tianhong Runfeng Decoration Engineering Co., LTD. Failure to set up safety warning marks Case 5: Beijing Tianhong Runfeng Decoration Engineering Co., LTD. Failure to set up safety warning marks for yuzhou fenghuang A-01-01 and A-01-03 thermal insulation and exterior wall coating projects constructed by the company in Tangshan city, which violated the provisions of Article 35 of The Safety Production Law.Tangshan Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau made a fine of 30,000 yuan to the administrative penalty.Case 6: Long Yao County Yaoshan gas station without fire design review unauthorized construction case the enterprise construction of long Yao County Yaoshan gas station transformation project, without fire design review unauthorized construction, its behavior violates the provisions of the “Fire Law” article 12.Longyao County Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau made a fine of 40,000 yuan administrative penalty.The first and second phase of longhua County central heating source site expansion project constructed by the company was put into use without filing after fire control acceptance, which violated the provisions of Article 13 of the Fire Control Law.The Longhua County Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau imposed a fine of 2,000 yuan.The enterprise piled up construction garbage in front of Yuanxianger Karaoke hall in Cangzhou city without covering and other dustproof measures, resulting in dust pollution, which violated the provisions of Article 11 of Hebei Province Dust Pollution Prevention And Control Measures.Cangzhou City Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau imposed a fine of 10,000 yuan on him.Case 9: Zhangjiakou Investment Business Service Co., LTD. Construction waste environmental pollution The company did not timely clean up and transport the construction waste generated in the construction process, resulting in environmental pollution, and its behavior violated the provisions of article 12 of the “Urban Construction waste Management Regulations”.Botou City comprehensive administrative law enforcement bureau made a fine of 42,000 yuan in accordance with the law.Case 10: Construction waste scattering case of Hebei Zhonglang Engineering Testing Service Co., LTD. The company did not take complete sealing measures to transport construction waste vehicles, resulting in the scattering, which violated the provisions of Article 41 of the Regulations on air Pollution Prevention and Control of Hebei Province.Langfang city comprehensive administrative law enforcement bureau made a fine of 10,000 yuan to the administrative penalty.